980,545
This will be a strange, disjointed post. (How could anyone tell?)
Intelligence is not a disease and is not something of which to be ashamed.
Today’s post title does not refer to this:
Or to this:
Instead, Monte Carlo refers to this: “Monte Carlo simulation is a computational algorithm that uses repeated random sampling to obtain the likelihood of a range of results of occurring.” I have written many times that I think life is a type of Monte Carlo simulation.
I am as close to absolutely certain as one can be, asymptotically approaching 100 percent, that if it were somehow possible for a person to live their life 10, 20, 100 times, it would NOT turn out exactly the same way each time. Well, one event has a 100 percent probability.
I think life has a range of outcomes with theoretical probabilities that, except for the one event, are not absolutely knowable. I absolutely reject the idea of destiny. If one’s actions have no effect on life outcomes, then what’s the point of living?!
The probability that I accepted the offer to work for the San Diego Padres and move to California in 1995, instead of accepting the job offer from a company much closer to home, was not 100%. If I had not moved to California, then I would not have met my wonderful wife. Of course, if I had not moved I might have married someone else or remained unmarried, but the point is that nothing is pre-ordained except the end of life.
Of course, we don’t have total control over our lives. Exogenous events occur and often we cannot totally escape the effects of such events. However, we still have choices and would not necessarily make the same choices in every life if we could live multiple lives. In addition, the same exogenous occurrences would almost certainly not happen in every life.
Anyway, all of this is a long way of saying that choices matter and that a person should not live their life on auto-pilot. In a way, this also means–at least to me–that it’s OK to admit a mistake and to move on, instead of trying to pour time, money and effort into trying to justify past decisions.
******************
This post from Why Evolution Is True is about FIRE (the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) suing California’s community college system for requiring professors to adhere to DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion or Deny Excellent Individuals as far as I am concerned) requirements.
Compelled speech is also a violation of a person’s First Amendment rights. I am almost certain that if this case were to end up in the Supreme Court FIRE would prevail and California would lose. That state’s community college system is a government entity and, as such, must adhere to the US Constitution.
******************
From this piece on Yahoo Finance:
“China’s economy has hit the skids in ways that suggest 25 years of supercharged growth may be ending, well before China achieves economic superpower status. China’s economy never powered out of the COVID pandemic the way the US economy did — and it’s barely growing now. Instead of marveling at China’s prosperity miracle, economists are now pondering whether China’s woes will bring down other parts of the global economy.
Desmond Lachman of the American Enterprise Institute recently told Reuters that China’s economy is unlikely to eclipse the United States anytime within the next 20 years. Economist Paul Krugman, also a New York Times columnist, likens China to Japan in the early 1990s. That’s when runaway growth came to a screeching halt and worries about an Asian nation’s world domination proved wildly unfounded.
Japan, at least, had become a rich country by then. China still isn’t, and it may never join the ranks of so-called advanced economies.”
I have written many times that China’s government is engaged in a desperate effort to raise that country’s per capita economic output to something at least approaching first-world levels before its population implodes from the effects of the One Child Policy. I have also often written that people in this country who admire China’s governmental “system” are utterly clueless.
I trust China’s government as far as I could throw Mount Everest.
******************
This recent piece from Mac’s Motor City Garage is about a car of which I am very fond, the Studebaker Gran Turismo Hawk. More specifically, it’s about the last edition, the 1964 model.
As you might remember, the Gran Turismo Hawk was included in Ultimate Garage 3.0, which is probably the last such endeavor I’ll publish. From the Mac’s piece:
Although any such purchase would be years away, or not happen at all (remember that only one life event has a 100% probability), with the knowledge that “my mechanic’s” shop will do “light” resto-modding, buying a Gran Turismo Hawk is an event with a probability greater than zero.
The model year designation notwithstanding, no Gran Turismo Hawks were built in calendar year 1964. Their production ended when Studebaker closed its facilities in South Bend, Indiana in December, 1963. The sad thing is that some Hawks had been built at the Canadian production plant that manufactured Studebakers until the cessation of automobile production in March, 1966. The car could have continued to be produced.
So many CARS just one life, after all.
#MonteCarlo
#DEI=DenyExcellentIndividuals
#ChinaIsAPaperTiger
#StudebakerGranTurismoHawk
#somanyCARSjustonelife
#disaffectedmusings
If you like this blog please tell your friends and share the blog URL (https://disaffectedmusings.com). Thanks.