It Never Ends…

While our family is dealing with a very serious situation at present, I/we received another kick in the teeth yesterday that we certainly didn’t need, but is certainly consistent with my life.

The new HVAC system that we had installed for the second floor just weeks ago has already given up the ghost. The compressor or condenser or whatever you call it outside still runs, but no air–cold or otherwise–comes out of any vent upstairs. I guess it’s a small blessing that this happened in May and not in July, but we’re around 90° for high temperatures with, of course, lots of sun. It’s less than comfortable upstairs; my office where I write this blog is on the second floor and even though it’s just 8 AM and the ceiling fan is on, it’s not exactly pleasant in here.

A small, very small, part of me still thinks the reckoning will come and somehow we will receive some great and unexpected turn of luck. That part is shrinking every day, though.


For some reason, this post from July of 2019 received some views yesterday. The post is about Nils Bohlin, the Volvo engineer who invented the modern automobile three-point safety belt.

When I read it again yesterday I thought it held up well and is among the better posts of the 1,100+ I have written. Feel free to read it.


On this day in 1963 the talks collapsed between Ford and Ferrari relating to Ford purchasing the Italian automaker. Supposedly, the deal breaker was a clause Ford inserted into the contract that required Ferrari to submit to Ford, ‘for quick approval,’ any racing team budget over 450 million lire. That equaled $257,000 at the time, the amount of Ferrari’s race budget for the 1963 season.

Ferrari said that provision would compromise the total freedom he had been promised in his new position as Racing Team Director. He flew into a rage and, basically, that was the end of the negotiation.

Of course, most of you reading know the rest. Henry Ford II flew into a rage of his own, vowed to beat Ferrari at LeMans and did with the Ford GT-40 cars.

The lineal descendant of those cars, the third generation Ford GT is–as I have mentioned previously–a contender for Ultimate Garage 3.0, if I ever publish it. Without further ado (from Money Inc):


See the source image



At $400,000 or $500,000 or whatever this car costs, it is more expensive than any automobile in Ultimate Garage 2.0. I think the GT moniker is somewhat of a misnomer. GT implies Grand Touring, a car with high performance, but one that is more at home cruising on the highway than whipping around corners at a race track. This generation Ford GT is very much at home on the track. Of course, what else could Ford call the car?

So many cars just one life, indeed.









If you like this blog please tell your friends and share the blog URL ( Thanks.


PS, courtesy of David Banner (not his real name) and relevant to comments from yesterday, a picture of a Bentley at a Hong Kong hotel:








Friday Fray

Fray: Verb, show the effects of strain (or) Noun, a battle or fight

The latter can certainly lead to the former…


Since at least the 1970 Census the suburbs have been the most populous part of the US. The common wisdom (a term that is often, but not always, an oxymoron) is that younger people, however, want to live in central cities. Well, maybe not anymore…this CNBC article, whose title begins, “The flight to the suburbs is real and growing…” states that (a site with which my wonderful wife and I are becoming quite familiar) experienced a 13% increase in searches in suburban zip codes in May, which is twice the increase seen in central city zips. From Javier Vivas, Director of Economic Research for as quoted in the CNBC piece, “This migration to the suburbs is not a new trend, but it has become more pronounced this spring. After several months of shelter-in-place orders, the desire to have more space and the potential for more people to work remotely are likely two of the factors contributing to the popularity of the burbs.”

The article itself (by Diana Olick) begins: “If millennials once piled into the cities, fueling downtown renewal and growth, apparently they are now piling out. The stay-at-home orders brought on by coronavirus have more potential homebuyers looking for properties in the suburbs. Millennials are now the largest cohort of buyers.”

In this post I criticized the belief held by many that we would be better off if more people lived in densely populated urban areas. Well, people are apparently voting with their feet, as they often do, and rejecting that belief.


On this day in 1966 Ford extracted a large measure of revenge against Ferrari when its GT40 MkII entries finished 1-2-3 in the 24 Hours of Le Mans. (Ferrari cars had won the race the previous five years.) With the three Ford cars way out in front during the final pit stop, Ford decided to stage a publicity stunt by having all three cars cross the finish line almost simultaneously. The leading #1 car driven by Ken Miles and Denny Hulme crossed the line next to the #2 car driven by Bruce McLaren and Chris Amon with the third car just behind. Even though both cars completed the same number of laps, since the #2 car had started farther back they were crowned the winner. Needless to say, Miles was not happy. He had already won the 24 Hours of Daytona and the 12 Hours of Sebring that year and winning Le Mans would have given him the “Triple Crown” of endurance racing. Supposedly, French race officials initially agreed to recognizing a dead-heat finish, but “changed their mind” near the end of the race.

From a picture of the 1966 Le Mans finish:


See the source image


In 2016, three years before the movie Ford v Ferrari was released, a “true” documentary about the Ford-Ferrari rivalry at Le Mans was released called The 24 Hour War. Sam Smith of Road and Track wrote this in a review of the latter film:


“In 1966, Ford won the 24 Hours of Le Mans for the first time. The following year, they won again. The year after that, they won a third time. And in 1969, a fourth.”

“That achievement was arguably the greatest in the company’s history. It came after years of struggle, more than a few public failures, and enough burnt cash to refloat the Titanic. Ford’s Sixties Le Mans program was famously the result of a dispute between Henry Ford II and Enzo Ferrari–Ford had tried to purchase Ferrari (the company), only to have Enzo shut down the sale at the last minute. Ford the man vowed to get even, aiming his considerable resources at Ferrari’s Le Mans record. The resulting warpath employed everyone from Bruce McLaren to Carroll Shelby and Indy 500 legend A.J. Foyt, putting the stops to Ferrari’s unbroken, five-year winning streak at La Sarthe.”

“Collectively, Ford’s wins were one of countless bright moments in a golden decade for both motorsport and culture in general. That first win made it onto the front pages of European newspapers, and it actually helped sell new cars. Ferrari never won Le Mans again, but Ford wouldn’t go back until 2016. When Dearborn won last year [2016], the world went less than nuts. But that makes sense: Both Le Mans and international motorsport are different now, tamer and less raw. So is the automobile itself. Racing is no longer a brutally dangerous pastime or the kind of thing that puts whole countries on the edge of their seats. And most of all, in 2016, there is no Henry the Deuce, no world-altering grudge match, no Enzo, no Carroll. The Ford-Ferrari war pivoted on how these men operated and thought, and they made that story what it was.”


Smith’s recap is excellent, IMO.







If you like this blog please tell your friends and share the blog URL ( Thanks.